UK Culture Secretary Andy Burnham says "let's give the internet DVD-style age classifications".
Of course, it’s not that simple. MP for West Bromich Tom Watson has asked for people’s views on the issue, and a huge number of comments has followed on his blog. A particular highlight for me though was John Handelaar’s comment. He points out that Burnham says:
“Leaving your child for two hours unregulated on the internet is not something you can do.”
JH then adds:
“Leaving your child unsupervised in a public library is likely to run a similar risk of exposure to age-inappropriate material.”
I’ve also contributed to the debate, blathering on for a bit, but the crux of what I’m saying is:
“I think most of what I would have said about the censorship/free speech side of the issue has already been mentioned here. But another concern that I don’t think has been bought up is the extent to which such regulations would stifle innovation and new businesses in what is still a very young industry. The need to comply with age classifications would stop many a small tech/digital media startup dead in their tracks. This is the last thing that’s needed at a time when many companies are concerning themselves with finding long-term revenue streams in a turbulent market.”
I had two thoughts about this issue:
1) During the dead air days after Christmas, politicians will come up with any nonsense old policy (cf. The Thick Of It) to gain themselves some exposure
2) If it were to happen, which it probably won’t, it could never, ever work (Cf. The Onion)
